MARTIN SCHULZE WESSEL, Revolution und religiöser Dissens. Der römisch-katholische und der russisch-orthodoxe Klerus als Träger des religiösen Wandels in den böhmischen Ländern und Russland 1848–1922: München 2011, Oldenbourg Verlag, 344 s.

Bedřich Loewenstein

doi:10.14712/24645370.2624

MARTIN SCHULZE WESSEL, Revolution und religiöser Dissens. Der römisch-katholische und der russisch-orthodoxe Klerus als Träger des religiösen Wandels in den böhmischen Ländern und Russland 1848–1922

München 2011, Oldenbourg Verlag, 344 s.

Authors

Bedřich Loewenstein

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14712/24645370.2624

Abstract

Review

Author Biography

Bedřich Loewenstein

Review

Downloads

PDF (Czech)

Published

2012-07-01

Issue

No. 1 (2012)

Section

Reviews and Reflections

How to Cite

“MARTIN SCHULZE WESSEL, Revolution Und religiöser Dissens. Der römisch-Katholische Und Der Russisch-Orthodoxe Klerus Als Träger Des religiösen Wandels in Den böhmischen Ländern Und Russland 1848–1922: München 2011, Oldenbourg Verlag, 344 S”. 2012. Dějiny – Teorie – Kritika, no. 1 (July): 162–164. https://doi.org/10.14712/24645370.2624.

Download Citation

Most read articles by the same author(s)

We often use the term "positivism" imprecisely, in the sense of scientific distaste for philosophical generalisation. Here I wish to attempt a reconstruction of the intellectural historical background to the origins and character of West European positivism. The experience of the French Revolution, denounced by its critics as the result of the Enlightenment theories, played a major role in the emergence of the tradition. Scientific demonstration (i. e. proof free of metaphysical speculation) of the inevitability of progress was seen as a way of ensuring that society avoided bling alleys – the terror of military despotism but also aristocratic reaction. The idea was that historical events, only superficially a mass of accidents and caprice, were in fact governed by laws as inexorable as those of the natural non-human world. Early positivist thought was motivated by this basic impulse, as can be shown in the histories of the French Revolution that are characterised in the first part of the essay. The classic works of positivist historical philosophical and sociological thinkers that are the subject of the second part of the essay are also ideological in the sense that they arise from period needs and interest in overcoming social crisis and scientifically demonstrating that progress was not just meaningful but unstoppadle. The weaknesses of the concepts and arguments employed, today very obvious, were to some extent already clear to John Stuart Mill, who applied a series of liberal corrections to the Comte´s version of the theory of inevitable social development. Both variants of positivism played a fundamental role in forming the historical thought of T. G. Masaryk, but the concepts of the French historians were also a discernible inspiration in Czech historiography., Positivism and liberalism , Dějiny – teorie – kritika: No. 1 (2004)
Bedřich Loewenstein , The Spirit and Politics , Dějiny – teorie – kritika: No. 1 (2013)
Bedřich Loewenstein, A Retrospective. A few Reflections on My Own Eightieth Birthday , Dějiny – teorie – kritika: No. 2 (2009)
Bedřich Loewenstein, Tomáš Hermann, Emanuel Rádl a české dějepisectví. Kritika českého dějepisectví ve sporu o smysl českých dějin , Dějiny – teorie – kritika: No. 1 (2004)
Bedřich Loewenstein, Reflections on Progress , Dějiny – teorie – kritika: No. 1 (2006)
Bedřich Loewenstein, On Progress and Faith in Progress: A Self-critical Author‘s Postscript , Dějiny – teorie – kritika: No. 2 (2010)