Phylogenetic trees and other evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks and their importance in secondary science education

Markéta Machová

doi:10.14712/18047106.1923

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): sciED Research Reports

Phylogenetic trees and other evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks and their importance in secondary science education

Markéta Machová, ¹

Pedagogická fakulta, UK

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1923

PDF

How to Cite

Machová, M. (2021). Phylogenetic trees and other evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks and their importance in secondary science education. Scientia in Educatione, 12(1), 16-36. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1923

Download Citation

Abstract

Diagrams describing relationship between organisms, and their overall evolution, commonly in the form of phylogenetic trees or other evolutionary diagrams, have become a part of even lower secondary biology textbooks. These diagrams can help promote basic science literacy, yet their design may also strengthen misconceptions about evolution. Therefore, based on the content analysis of 112 Czech biology textbooks for secondary schools (ISCED levels 2 and 3), characteristics of introduced phylogenetic trees and other evolutionary diagrams were recorded and evaluated according to the cladistics to see if their construction supports the current scientific understanding of evolution. The content analysis indicates that the design of nearly half of all diagrams in current lower (ISCED 2) and upper secondary (ISCED 3) textbooks promotes ladder thinking. More than 80% of all diagrams were not accompanied by instructions on how to read them, meaning that students did not have sufficient scaffolding to understand them. Mainly ISCED 3 textbooks did not introduce additional problem tasks that would support the use of the diagrams in the lessons. Therefore, authors of textbooks should focus more on the construction quality of these diagrams while also supporting their correct application during the educational process. This is likely to prevent a further increase in student misconceptions.

Keywords phylogenetic trees evolutionary diagrams biology textbooks secondary education

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

[1] Ainsworth, S., & Saffer, J. (2013). Can children read evolutionary trees? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.59.2.0221 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[2] Angielczyk, K. D. (2009). Dimetrodon is not a dinosaur: Using tree thinking to understand the ancient relatives of mammals and their evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0117-4 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[3] Baum, D. (2008). Reading a phylogenetic tree: The meaning of monophyletic groups. Nature Education, 1(1), 190. https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/reading-a-phylogenetic-tree-the-meaning-of-41956/ Search in Google Scholar

[4] Byrne, J., Grace, M., & Hanley, P. (2009). Children’s anthropomorphic and anthropocentric ideas about micro-organisms. Journal of Biological Education, 44(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2009.9656190 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[5] Catley, K. M., & Novick, L. R. (2008). Seeing the wood for the trees: An analysis of evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks. BioScience, 58(10), 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1641/B581011 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[6] Cocks, S., & Simpson, S. (2015). Anthropocentric and ecocentric: An application of environmental philosophy to outdoor recreation and environmental education. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(3), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825915571750 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[7] Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Common origins of diverse misconceptions: cognitive principles and the development of biology thinking. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(3), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-06-0074 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[8] Čornejová, I., Kasper, T., Kasperová, D., Kourová, P., Kratochvíl, P., Lenderová, M., Novotný, M., Pokorný, J., Svatoš, M., Svobodný, P., Šimek, J., & Váňová, R. (2020). Velké dějiny zemí Koruny české: školství a vzdělanost (M. Novotný (ed.)). [Great history of the Lands of the Bohemian Crown: Education.] Paseka. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Davenport, K., Milks, K. J., & Tassell, R. Van. (2015). Investigating tree thinking Search in Google Scholar

[11] & ancestry with cladograms. The American Biology Teacher, 77(3), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2015.77.3.8 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dayrat, B. (2003). The roots of phylogeny: How did Haeckel build his trees? Systematic Biology, 52(4), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150390218277 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[13] Dees, J., Bussard, C., & Momsen, J. L. (2018). Further effects of phylogenetic tree style on student comprehension in an introductory biology course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2), ar17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-03-0058 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[14] Dees, J., Momsen, J. L., Niemi, J., & Montplaisir, L. (2014). Student interpretations of phylogenetic trees in an introductory biology course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 666–676. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-01-0003 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[15] Diogo, R., Ziermann, J. M., & Linde-Medina, M. (2015). Is evolutionary biology becoming too politically correct? A reflection on the scala naturae, phylogenetically basal clades, anatomically plesiomorphic taxa, and ‘lower’ animals. Biological Reviews, 90(2), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12121 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[16] Dvořáková, R. M., & Absolonová, K. (2017). Obsahová analýza tématu evoluce člověka v českých učebnicích přírodopisu a biologie [Content analysis of Czech school biology textbook with regard to human evolution topics]. Scientia in Educatione, 8(2), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.765 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[17] Dvořáková, R., & Schierová, Z. (2019). Co už o vzniku a vývoji člověka raději neučit [What better not to teach about the origin and development of humankind?]. Arnica, 9(2), 59–65. https://www.arnica.zcu.cz/images/casopis/2019/Arnika_2019_2-2-Dvorakova-Schierova-web.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[18] Eddy, S. L., Crowe, A. J., Wenderoth, M. P., & Freeman, S. (2013). How should we teach tree-thinking? An experimental test of two hypotheses. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1936-6434-6-13 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[19] Felsenstein, J. (1985). Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist, 125(1), 1–15. https://courses.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/course-material/4523940/Felsenstein85.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[20] Gibson, J. P., & Cooper, J. T. (2017). Botanical phylo-cards: A tree-thinking game to teach plant evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 79(3), 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2017.79.3.241 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[21] Gregory, T. R. (2008). Understanding evolutionary trees. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0035-x Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[22] Halverson, Kristy L., Pires, C. J., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Exploring the complexity of tree thinking expertise in an undergraduate systematics course. Science Education, 95(5), 794–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20436 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[23] Halverson, K. L. (2011). Improving tree-thinking one learnable skill at a time. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0307-0 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[24] Hlaváčová, L. (2017). Systematický přístup prezentace učiva přírodopisu/biologie taxonomically conceived curriculum of natural science/biology]. Biologie. Chemie. Zeměpis, 26(3), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.14712/25337556.2017.3.6 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[25] Hoßfeld, U., Watts, E., & Levit, G. S. (2017). The first Darwinian phylogenetic tree of plants. Trends in Plant Science, 22(2), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.12.002 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[26] Hrabí, L. (2006). An evaluation of graphical information presented in biology textbooks. E-Pedagogium, 6(1), 26–32. https://e-pedagogium.upol.cz/artkey/epd-200601-0002_hodnoceni-graficke-informace-ucebnic-prirodopisu.php Search in Google Scholar

[27] Kong, Y., Thawani, A., Anderson, T., & Pelaez, N. (2017). A model of the use of evolutionary trees (MUET) to inform K-14 biology education. The American Biology Teacher, 79(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2017.79.2.81 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[28] Kopnina, H. (2014). Revisiting education for sustainable development (ESD): Examining anthropocentric bias through the transition of environmental education to ESD. Sustainable Development, 22(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.529 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[29] Kummer, T. A., Whipple, C. J., & Jensen, J. L. (2016). Prevalence and persistence of misconceptions in tree thinking. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1156 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[30] McCullough, E. L., Verdeflor, L., Weinsztok, A., Wiles, J. R., & Dorus, S. (2020). Exploratory activities for understanding evolutionary relationships depicted by phylogenetic trees: United but diverse. The American Biology Teacher, 82(5), 333–337. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2020.82.5.333 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[31] McLennan, D. A. (2010). How to read a phylogenetic tree. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(4), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0273-6 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[32] Meisel, R. P. (2010). Teaching tree-thinking to undergraduate biology students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(4), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0254-9 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[33] Mivart, S. G. (1865). Contributions towards a more complete knowledge of the axial skeleton in the primates. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 33(1), 545–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1865.tb02387.x Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[34] Morrison, D. A. (1996). Phylogenetic tree-building. International Journal for Parasitology, 26(6), 589–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7519(96)00044-6 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[35] Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. (2016). Fostering 21st-century evolutionary reasoning: Teaching tree thinking to introductory biology students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 15(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-06-0127 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[36] Novick, L. R., Schreiber, E. G., & Catley, K. M. (2014). Deconstructing evolution education: The relationship between micro- and macroevolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(6), 759–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21161 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[37] Novick, L. R., Stull, A. T., & Catley, K. M. (2012). Reading phylogenetic trees: The effects of tree orientation and text processing on comprehension. BioScience, 62(8), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.8 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[38] NÚV. (2021). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání [Framework education programme for elementary education]. MŠMT. http://www.nuv.cz/file/4983/ Search in Google Scholar

[39] Omland, K. E., Cook, L. G., & Crisp, M. D. (2008). Tree thinking for all biology: The problem with reading phylogenies as ladders of progress. BioEssays, 30(9), 854–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20794 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[40] Phillips, B. C., Novick, L. R., Catley, K. M., & Funk, D. J. (2012). Teaching tree thinking to college students: It’s not as easy as you think. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(4), 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0455-5 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[41] Podani, J. (2019). The coral of life. Evolutionary Biology, 46(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-019-09474-w Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[42] Reddy, B. P. N. (2011). Basics for the construction of phylogenetic trees. WebmedCentral BIOLOGY, 2(12). https://doi.org/10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.002563 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[43] Sa’adah, S., Hidayat, T., & Sudargo, F. (2017). Undergraduate students’ initial ability in understanding phylogenetic tree. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 824, 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012040 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[44] Sandvik, H. (2008). Tree thinking cannot taken for granted: challenges for teaching phylogenetics. Theory in Biosciences, 127(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-008-0022-3 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[45] Schneider, B., Strait, M., Muller, L., Elfenbein, S., Shaer, O., & Shen, C. (2012). Phylo-Genie: Engaging students in collaborative “tree-thinking” through tabletop techniques. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’12, 3071–3080. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208720 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[46] Schramm, T., Schachtschneider, Y., & Schmiemann, P. (2019). Understanding the tree of life: an overview of tree-reading skill frameworks. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 12(11), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0104-3 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[47] Scott, A. D., & Baum, D. A. (2016). Phylogenetic tree. In Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Biology (pp. 270–276). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800049-6.00203-1 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[48] Wiens, J. J. (2004). The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Systematic Biology, 53(4), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490472959 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[49] Yang, Z., & Rannala, B. (2012). Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13(5), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3186 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[50] Ypma, R. J. F., van Ballegooijen, W. M., & Wallinga, J. (2013). Relating phylogenetic trees to transmission trees of infectious disease outbreaks. Genetics, 195(3), 1055–1062. httpss://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.154856 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[51] Zachos, F. E. (2016). Tree thinking and species delimitation: Guidelines for taxonomy and phylogenetic terminology. Mammalian Biology, 81(2), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2015.10.002 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[52] Zrzavý, J., Storch, D., & Mihulka, S. (2004). Jak se dělá evoluce: od sobeckého genu Search in Google Scholar

[53] k rozmanitosti života [How evolution is done: From the selfish gene to the diversity of life]. Paseka. Search in Google Scholar

Scientia in educatione

Phylogenetic trees and other evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks and their importance in secondary science education

How to Cite

Abstract

References

Downloads

License