Abstrakt
The inquiry-based approach is the fundamental way of acquiring new knowledge in science. It is therefore essential to incorporate it into science education. A key principle is bridging the gap between asking questions and final answers, which requires an appropriate inquiry procedure. This study examined the planning skills of lower secondary school students when solving biology tasks based on an inquiry-based approach. Sets of solutions to six tasks from 51 Czech students were analysed. Closed and open coding based on research design aspects derived from the EDAT framework was used. The results show that most students recognized the need for an empirical approach and frequently identified observed variables and instruments. However, aspects of the inquiry process, such as controlling variables, replication, data analysis, and reducing uncertainty, were rarely included or were omitted. Differences were also found between tasks with descriptive and causal problems and across task contexts. The results suggest that inquiry-based learning needs more explicit support for the development of planning skills, with a focus on the complexity of research procedures. It also appears necessary to address these skills across various thematic units.
Reference
- Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Arnold, J. C., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Understanding students’ experiments—what kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2719–2749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.930209 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Baltikian, M., Kärkkäinen, S., & Kukkonen, J. (2024). Assessment of scientific literacy levels among secondary school students in Lebanon: exploring gender-based differences. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3), em2407. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14279 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Bewersdorff, A., Seßler, K., Baur, A., Kasneci, E., & Nerdel, C. (2023). Assessing student errors in experimentation using artificial intelligence and large language models: a comparative study with human raters. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100177 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Brown, J. P. (2019). Real-World Task Context: Meanings and Roles. In G. A. Stillman & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Lines of inquiry in mathematical modelling research in education (pp. 53–81). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14931-4 4 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Crujeiras-Pérez, B., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2017). High school students’ engagement in planning investigations: findings from a longitudinal study in Spain [10.1039/C6RP00185H]. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00185H Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Čipková, E., Šmida, D., & Pecníková, K. (2025). Evaluation of the level of selected inquiry skills among grammar school students. Science & Education, 34(5), 3727–3749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00602-3 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Elhai, J. (2023). Science literacy: a more fundamental meaning. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24(1), e00212-00222. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00212-22 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Fugarasti, H., Ramli, M., & Muzzazinah. (2019). Undergraduate students’ science process skills: a systematic review. In N. Y. Indryanti, M. Ramli, & F. Nurhasanah (Eds.), AIP Conference proceedings: Vol. 2194 (1). 2nd International conference on Science, Mathematics, Environment, and Education. AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139762 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P.W. (2019). Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson. Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Hamnell-Pamment, Y. (2024). The role of scientific language use and achievement level in student sensemaking. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(4), 737–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10405-7 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Harlen, W. (2021). The case for inquiry-based science education (IBSE). AIP. https://www.interacademies.org/publication/case-inquiry-based-science-education-ibse Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Heindl, M. (2019). Inquiry-based learning and the pre-requisite for its use in science at school: a meta-analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 3(2), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2019254160 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Chen, F., & Chen, G. (2025). Learning analytics in inquiry-based learning: a systematic review. Educational technology research and development, 73(4), 2131–2161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10507-9 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Janštová, V., & Pavlasová, L. (2019). Inquiry vs. cookbooks in practical teaching biology viewed by teachers. In M. Rusek & K. Vojíř (Eds.), Project-based education and other activating strategies in science education XVI (pp. 30–36). https://page.pedf.cuni.cz/pbe/files/2019/07/sbornikPBE2018 wos.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Jerrim, J., Oliver, M., & Sims, S. (2022). The relationship between inquiry-based teaching and students’ achievement. New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in England. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101310 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Ješková, Z., Lukáč, S., Šnajder, Ľ., Guniš, J., Klein, D., & Kireš, M. (2022). Active learning in STEM education with regard to the development of inquiry skills. Education Sciences, 12(10), 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100686 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Kang, J. (2022). Interrelationship between inquiry-based learning and instructional quality in predicting science literacy. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09946-6 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Karlsen, S., Kersting, M., Ødegaard, M., Olufsen, M., Lill Suhr, M., & Kjærnsli, M. (2025). A comparative study of teachers’ conceptualisations and enactment of inquiry-based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2547411 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Klahr, D., & Chen, Z. (2011). Finding one’s place in transfer space. Child Development Perspectives, 5(3), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00171.x Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Kok, K. (2022). Certain about uncertainty [Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin]. https://doi.org/10.18452/24782 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Kranz, J., Baur, A., & Möller, A. (2023). Learners’ challenges in understanding and performing experiments: a systematic review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 321–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2138151 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Lazonder, A.W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Lombardi, D., Bailey, J. M., Bickel, E. S., & Burrell, S. (2018). Scaffolding scientific thinking: students’ evaluations and judgments during Earth science knowledge construction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.008 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- McComas, W. F. (2014). Science process skills. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The language of science education: An expanded glossary of key terms and concepts in science teaching and learning (pp. 89–89). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0 79 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Mocanu, M., Bibiri, A.-D., Rusu, V. D., Moro¸sanu, A., & Bejan, I. G. (2025). Enhancing civic engagement with science: a comparative approach across European regions. Scientometrics, 130(1), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05198-7 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- NASEM. (2016). Science Literacy: concepts, contexts, and consequences. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23595 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Nejedlý, A., & Vojíř, K. (2022). How do students formulate a research question and conclusions in science research? In M. Rusek & M. Tóthová (Eds.), Project-based education and other student-activation strategies and issues in science education XIX. (pp. 29–38). Charles University, Faculty of Education. https://pages.pedf.cuni.cz/pbe/files/2022/10/ProceedingsPBE2021 final.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Nejedlý, A., & Vojíř, K. (2024). How to construct inquiry tasks: a methodological framework and task piloting. In D. Koperová & M. Rusek (Eds.), Project-based education and other activating strategies in science education XXI. (pp. 125–135). Charles University, Faculty of Education. https://pages.pedf.cuni.cz/pbe/files/2024/09/PBE2023 final.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Nejedlý, A., & Vojíř, K. (2025). The role of inquiry-based learning: development of analytical skills in orientation and conceptualization by science inquiry at lower secondary school. In G. L. Chova, M. G. Ch., & L. J. (Eds.), 17th International conference on education and new learning technologies (Vol. 17, Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- pp. 7494–7501). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2025.1845 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 results (volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- OECD. (2023b). PISA 2025 Science framework draft. https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/assets/docs/PISA 2025 Science Framework.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- OECD. (2025). OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2025: driving change in a shifting landscape. https://doi.org/10.1787/5fe57b90-en Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Oliver, M., McConney, A., & Woods-McConney, A. (2021). The efficacy of inquiry-based instruction in science: a comparative analysis of six countries using PISA 2015. Research in Science Educcation, 51 (Suppl 2), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09901-0 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Osborne, J., & Allchin, D. (2024). Science literacy in the twenty-first century: informed trust and the competent outsider. International Journal of Science Education, 47(15–16), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2331980 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. King’s College London. https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Sci Ed in Europe Report Final1.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Pedaste, M., Baucal, A., & Reisenbuk, E. (2021). Towards a science inquiry test in primary education: development of items and scales. International Journal of Stem Education, 8(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00278-z Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Pedaste, M., Maeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Renkl, A. (2014). Toward an instructionally oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science, 38(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12086 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Riga, F., Winterbottom, M., Harris, E., & Newby, L. (2017). Inquiry-based science education. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education: An international course companion (pp. 247–261). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8 19 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Seeratan, K. L., McElhaney, K.W., Mislevy, J., McGhee Jr, R., Conger, D., & Long, M. C. (2020). Measuring students’ ability to engage in scientific inquiry: A new instrument to assess data analysis, explanation, and argumentation. Educational Assessment, 25(2), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1756253 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Shaffer, J. F., Dang, J. V., Lee, A. K., Dacanay, S. J., Alam, U., Wong, H. Y., Richards, G. J., Kadandale, P., & Sato, B. K. (2016). A familiar(ity) problem: assessing the impact of prerequisites and content familiarity on student learning. PLoS One, 11(1), e0148051. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148051 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Shanks, R. A., Robertson, C. L., Haygood, C. S., Herdliksa, A.M., Herdliska, H. R., & Lloyd, S. A. (2017). Measuring and advancing experimental design ability in an Introductory course without altering existing lab curriculum. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1194 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Schäfer, J., Reuter, T., Karbach, J., & Leuchter, M. (2024). Domain-specific knowledge and domain-general abilities in children’s science problem-solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12649 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Schwichow, M., Brandenburger, M., & Wilbers, J. (2022). Analysis of experimental design errors in elementary school: how do students identify, interpret, and justify controlled and confounded experiments? International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.2015544 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Sirum, K., & Humburg, J. (2011). The experimental design ability test (EDAT). Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching, 37(1), 8–16. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ943887.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Sjøberg, S. (2018). The power and paradoxes of PISA: should inquiry-based science education be sacrificed to climb on the rankings? Nordic Studies in Science Education, 14(2), 186–202. https://journals.uio.no/nordina/article/view/6185/5249 Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, K. E., & Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: a systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 191–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Tairab, H. H. (2015). Assessing students’ understanding of control of variables across three grade levels and gender. International Education Studies, 9(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n1p44 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Teig, N. (2024). Uncovering student strategies for solving scientific inquiry tasks: insights from student process data in PISA. Research in Science Education, 54(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10134-5 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- van Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2016). Inquiry-based science education: towards a pedagogical framework for primary school teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1147660 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- van Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2017). Inquiry-based science education: scaffolding pupils’ self-directed learning in open inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2461–2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1388940 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Vojíř, K. (2021). What tasks are included in chemistry textbooks for lower- secondary schools: a qualitative view. In M. Rusek, M. Tóthová, & K. Vojíř (Eds.), Project-based education and other activating strategies in science education XVIII. https://pages.pedf.cuni.cz/pbe/files/2021/05/ProceedingsPBE2020 final.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Volkmann, M., & Abell, S. (2003). Rethinking laboratories. Science Teacher, 70(6), 38–41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24156087 Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- World Economic Forum. (2026). The global risks report 2026. World Economic Forum. https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF Global Risks Report 2026.pdf Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Zetterqvist, A., & Bach, F. (2023). Epistemic knowledge – a vital part of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 45(6), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2166372 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001 Přejít na DOI Vyhledej v Google Scholar
