Abstract
The paper reconsiders some well-known problems of learning physics, in the light of recent work on the way human beings respond to problems, particularly the distinction between “fast” and “slow” thinking. It concludes that much depends on the choice of situation with which to educate “fast” thinking. This leads to a critique of recent thinking about “Inquiry Based Science Education”. The paper concludes with a discussion of problems and opportunities that currently face curriculum development in physics.
References
- ATKIN, J., BLACK, P. Inside Science Education Reform. Buckingham : Open University Press, 2003. Search in Google Scholar
- BLACK, P., HARRISON, C., LEE, C., MARSHALL, B., WILIAM, D. Assessment for Learning: Putting it into Practice. Maidenhead : Open University Press, 2003. Search in Google Scholar
- DUIT, R. Bibliography—STCSE (Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education), 2010. http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/download stcse.html Search in Google Scholar
- EULER, M. The role of experiments in the teaching and learning of physics. Research in Physics Education, Varenna Course CLVI, Amsterdam : IOS Press, 2004, p. 175–221. Search in Google Scholar
- FEYNMAN, R. QED: the strange theory of light and matter. Harmondsworth : Penguin Books Ltd., 1985. Search in Google Scholar
- JARVIS, T., PELL, A., HINGLEY, P. POLLEN primary teachers’ changing confidence and attitudes over two years POLLEN in-service programme, The Curriculum Journal, 2009, Vol. 13, No. 1, p. 43–69. Search in Google Scholar
- LINDAHL, B. Changes in pupils’ attitudes towards science during two years within the POLLEN project, 2009. http://www.pollen-europa.net Search in Google Scholar
- KAHNEMAN, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London : Allen Lane, 2011. Search in Google Scholar
- MILLAR, R. Rethinking science education: meeting the challenge of “science for all”. School Science Review, 2012, Vol. 93, No. 345, p. 21–30. Search in Google Scholar
- MUSE, 2010. http://education.epsdivisions.org/muse Search in Google Scholar
- OGBORN, J. (Ed.) Nuffield Advanced Physics, Harmondsworth : Penguin Books Ltd., 1971. Search in Google Scholar
- OGBORN, J. (Ed.) Advancing Physics AS, A2. Bristol : Institute of Physics Publishing (now published by Oxford University Press), 2000. Search in Google Scholar
- OGBORN, J., TAYLOR, E. Quantum physics explains Newton’s laws of motion, Physics Education, 2005, Vol. 40, No. 1, p. 1–9. Search in Google Scholar
- POLLEN. Designing and Implementing Inquiry-Based Units, 2009. http://www.pollen-europa.net/?page=ietK5bjge5o%3D Search in Google Scholar
- ROCARD, Y. Science Education Now. Brussels : European Commission Report EU22-845, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
- ROZIER, S., VIENNOT, L. Students’ reasoning in thermodynamics, International Journal of Science Education, 1991, Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 159–170. Search in Google Scholar
- VIENNOT, L. Reasoning in Physics: the part of common sense. Brussels : Kluwer, 2001. Search in Google Scholar
- VIENNOT, L. Teaching rituals and students’ intellectual satisfaction. Physics Education, 2006, Vol. 41, p. 400–408. Search in Google Scholar
- VIENNOT, L. Physics by inquiry: beyond rituals and echo-explanations. In L. Menabue, G. Santoro (Eds.) New Trends in Science and Technology Education, Selected papers, Bologna : CLUEB, 2010a, Vol. 1, p. 240–256. Search in Google Scholar
- VIENNOT, L. Physics education research and inquiry-based teaching: a question of didactical consistency. In K. Kortland (Ed.) Designing Theory-Based Teaching-Learning Sequences for Science Education, Utrecht : CDBeta Press, 2010b. Search in Google Scholar
Downloads
1
- Oborové didaktiky: vývoj – stav – perspektivyhttps://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-7884-2015
0
1
0
Find citations
Download data is not yet available.