Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School
PDF

How to Cite

Šestáková, J. (2016). Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School. Scientia in Educatione, 7(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.298

Abstract

The article describes the results of the case study “Implementation of the Peer Instruction method into education in the Czech Republic”, trying to answer one main question: “How is the Peer Instruction method implemented into physics teaching at upper secondary Czech school?”.
The data was collected through interviews with the teacher, lesson observation and questionnaires for the teacher and students. The teacher involved in the study had been interested in the method since 2009. The research findings resulting from lesson observation and students’ opinions are from the 2014/2015 school year, when the method was implemented with students aged 17–18 years in three physics classes taught at an upper secondary school, with the respective numbers of students being 28, 16 and 13. The research generated the following conclusions, among other things: (1) the method should ideally be used immediately after a presentation of a new topic, therefore e.g. once a month, (2) a maximum of two ConcepTest questions should be used within one 45-minute lesson, and (3) students’ responses should be collected by means of ï¬ashcards rather than by an electronic voting system. The teacher starting with the method expected that ConcepTest questions would be simple for students and the work pace would be faster. She tried to hasten the work and therefore sometimes did not give students enough time to think about their responses, occasionally even failing to provide the option of a second answer. Nevertheless, the participating students gave positive feedback on this method, strongly indicating that that they had learned more while using this method. They admitted that using ï¬ashcards during the first answering was a strong incentive that boosted their motivation towards thinking about the answers. This article is intended for people interested in the Peer Instruction method, teachers and researchers in active learning.
https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.298
PDF

References

Crouch, C. H. & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics , 69(9), 970–977.

Dvořáková, I. (2014). Active learning in the Heureka Project — teachers in the role of students. ICPE-EPEC 2013 Conference Proceedings. 47–62. Available from http://iupap-icpe.org/publications/proceedings/ICPE-EPEC 2013 proceedings.pdf

Ghosh, S. & Renna, F. (2006). Technology in support of good pedagogy: Electronic response systems and Peer Instruction in an economics classroom. Social Science Research Network . Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=888544

Harvard.edu. (2016). APPHY 50A: Physics as a Foundation for Science and Engineering, Part I . Available from https://canvas.harvard.edu/courses/13398

Lasry, N. (2008). Clickers or Flashcards: Is There Really a Difference? The Physics Teacher , 46, 242–244.

Lepil, O. & Široká, M (2001). Sbírka testových úloh k maturitě z fyziky. Prometheus.

Mazur, E. (2014). Peer Instruction: A user’s manual. Pearson Education Limited.

Pearson (2016). Learning Catalytics. Available from https://learningcatalytics.com/

Penuel, W. R., Boscardin, C. K., Masyn, K. & Crawrord, V. M. (2007). Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survay study. Educational Technology, Research and Development , 55(4), 315–346. Available from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-006-9023-4

Rao, S. P. & DiCarlo, S. E. (2000). Peer Instruction improves performance on quizzes. Advantage in Physiology Education , 24(1), 51–55.

Savinainen, A. & Scott, P. (2002). Using the Force Concept Inventory to monitor student learning and to plan teaching. Physics Education , 37(1), 53–58.

Schell, J. (2016). Turn to your neighbor. The oï¬cial Peer Instruction blog. Available from http://blog.peerinstruction.net/

Šestáková, J. (2016). Peer Instruction. Available from http://peerinstruction.cz/

Švaříček, R. & Šeďová, K. (2007). Kvalitativní výzkum. Portál.