The Crisis of Ontology – the Challenge of Education

Authors

  • Michal Černý Department of Library and Information Studies, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2023.3184

Keywords:

ontology, crisis, philosophy of education, atomism, Kuhn, Lakoff, Šíp, Latour

Abstract

The study is based on a reflection of the current dominant philosophy of education as an atomistically reduced understanding of reality. This reduction was highly productive in the Industrial Revolution and early modernity but also led to a limited ability to reflect educationally appropriate complex phenomena. At this point, the study relies primarily on Hejdánek's non-object and object thinking concepts. He sees the starting point in the notion of process and ecological ontology as contemplated by Arrow, Lakoff, and Latour. The study relies on Kuhn's model of the development of science. It builds on it by analysing two – existing in the school environment – phenomena, namely the global ecological crisis and the formation of identity, in which the emphasis on the entity concept leads to the impossibility of dealing with these phenomena. The final part of the study highlights selected conceptualisations that lead to the possibility of abandoning only the atomistic reduction of the ontological description of the world and offer perspectives of a more multiparadigmatic, processual understanding of education.

References

Adam, B., Beck, U., & Loon, J. van (Eds.). (2000). The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory. Sage.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219539

Azimovna, F. M. (2020). Formation of spiritual and moral values of pupils in physical education lessons. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, 9(11), 99-103.

https://doi.org/10.5958/2278-4853.2020.00280.3

Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Damasio, A. (2008). Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1-3), 35-39.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.012

PMid:18472250

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, K. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62.

https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500

Bauman, Z. (2004). Individualizovaná společnost. Mladá fronta.

Bauman, Z. (2005). Education in liquid modernity. The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 27(4), 303-317.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10714410500338873

Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage.

Bělohradský, V. (2021). Čas pléthokracie: Když části jsou větší než celky a světový duch spadl z koně. 65. pole.

Beurden, E. K., Kia, A. M., Zask, A., Dietrich, U., & Rose, L. (2013). Making sense in a complex landscape: How the Cynefin Framework from Complex Adaptive Systems Theory can inform health promotion practice. Health Promotion International, 28(1), 73-83.

https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dar089

PMid:22128193

Bridle, J. (2018). New dark age: Technology and the end of the future. Verso Books.

https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406741784

Caldera, S., Desha, C., & Dawes, L. (2022). Applying Cynefin framework to explore the experiences of engineering educators undertaking "emergency remote teaching" during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 27(1), 3-15.

https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2021.2020958

Cantor, G. N., Christie, J. R. R., Hodge, M. J. S., & Olby, R. C. (Eds.). (2020). Companion to the history of modern science. Routledge.

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.

https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Coeckelbergh, M., & Gunkel, D. J. (2023). ChatGPT: deconstructing the debate and moving it forward. AI & Society, 39, 2221-2231.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01710-4

Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(5).

Cormier, D. (2017). The community is the curriculum subtitle: A rhizomatic learning companion. (Online). Dostupné z https://davecormier.pressbooks.com/.

Damasio, A. R. (2000). Descartesův omyl: Emoce, rozum a lidský mozek. Mladá fronta.

Damasio, A. R. (2018). The strange order of things: Life, feeling, and the making of the cultures. Pantheon Books.

Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. The Educational Forum, 50(3), 241-252.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764

Dorrien, G. (2009). Social ethics in the making: Interpreting an American tradition. John Wiley & Sons.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305760

Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and app‐work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114-132.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258

Dutton, W. H. (2004). Social transformation in an information society: Rethinking access to you and the world. UNESCO.

Felski, R. (1994). The gender of modernity. In S. Ledger, J. McDonagh & J. Spencer (Eds.), Political Gender. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674036796

Floridi, L. (2011). The construction of personal identities online. Minds & Machines, 21(4), 477-479.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-011-9254-y

Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.

Floridi, L. (Ed.). (2015). The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era. Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6

Floridi, L. (2019). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833635.001.0001

Foucault, M. (2000). Dohlížet a trestat: Kniha o zrodu vězení. Dauphin.

Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019

Halík, T. (2021). Odpoledne křesťanství: Odvaha k proměně. Lidové noviny.

Heidegger, M. (1993a). Básnicky bydlí člověk. Oikoymenh.

Heidegger, M. (1993b). Konec filosofie a úkol myšlení. 2. vyd. Oikoymenh.

Heidegger, M. (2004). Věda, technika a zamyšlení. Oikoymenh.

Heidegger, M. (2014). Co znamená myslet? Oikoymenh.

Heidegger, M. (2016). Původ uměleckého díla. Oikoymenh.

Heidegger, M. (2018). Bytí a čas. Oikoymenh.

Heidegger, M., & Chvatík, I. (2023). Úvahy II-VI : Černé sešity 1931-1938. Academia.

Hejdánek, L. (1997). Nepředmětnost v myšlení a ve skutečnosti. Oikoymenh.

Holmberg, Å., Jensen, P., & Vetere, A. (2021). Spirituality - a forgotten dimension? Developing spiritual literacy in family therapy practice. Journal of Family Therapy, 43(1), 78-95.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12298

Hoppner, T., & Streatfeild, L. (2023). ChatGPT, Bard & Co.: An introduction to AI for competition and regulatory lawyers. 9 Hausfeld Competition Bulletin, 1(1).

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4371681

Ibáñez-Rueda, N., Guillén-Royo, M., & Guardiola, J. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior, connectedness to nature, and wellbeing dimensions among Granada students. Sustainability, 12(21).

https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219171

Jarvis, P. (2012). Teaching, learning, and education in late modernity: The selected works of Peter Jarvis. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203802946

Jemelka, P. (2022). Environmentální hodnoty a přírodní próza. Studia Philosophica, 69(2), 7-26.

https://doi.org/10.5817/SPh2022-2-2

Johnson, M. (2017). Embodied mind, meaning, and reason. University of Chicago Press.

https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226500393.001.0001

Jones, J. (2022, únor 17). LGBT identification in U.S. ticks up to 7.1%. Politics 17. 2. 2022.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

Keller, J. (2000). Vzestup a pád středních vrstev. SLON.

Kellner, D. (2018). Donald Trump, globalization, and modernity. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3), 265-284.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0208-5

Kratochvíl, Z. (2023). Demokritos B. (Online). Dostupné z www.fysis.cz/presokratici/demokritos/Dem_b.htm.

Krüger, K.-H. (2016). Gesellschaftlicher Wertewandel: Generation X, Y, Z - und dann? In H. Klaus & H. J. Schneider (Eds.), Personalperspektiven: Human Resource Management und Führung im ständigen Wandel (s. 39-71). Springer Fachmedien.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13971-1_3

Kučerová, T., & Lesáková, M. (2019). Dnes už rozlišujeme přes 40 variant pohlaví, řekl v Rozstřelu genderový expert. (Online). iDnes.cz, 21. 11. 2019.

Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. 3. vyd. University of Chicago Press.

https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001

Kurzweil, R. (2006). Reinventing humanity: The future of machine-human intelligence. The Futurist, 40(2), 39-40, 42-46.

Lakoff, G. (2008). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369-381.

Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Latour, B. (2020). Zpátky na zem: Jak se vyznat v politice Nového klimatického režimu. Neklid.

Latour, B. (2021). After lockdown: A metamorphosis. Polity Press.

Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2022). Is employee technological "ill-being" missing from corporate responsibility? The foucauldian ethics of ubiquitous IT uses in organizations. In K. Martin, K. Shilton & J. Smith (Eds.), Business and the ethical implications of technology (s. 33-55). Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18794-0_3

Lehmann, P., Ammunét, T., Barton, M., Battisti, A., Eigenbrode, S. D., Jepsen, J. U., … & Björkman, C. (2020). Complex responses of global insect pests to climate warming. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 18(3), 141-150.

https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2160

Lévinas, E. (1997). Totalita a nekonečno: Esej o exterioritě. Oikoymenh.

Lloyd, A. (2010). Framing information literacy as information practice: Site ontology and practice theory. Journal of Documentation, 66(2), 245-258.

https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011023643

Mestenhauser, J. A. (1988). Culture, learning, and the disciplines. NAFSA Association of International Educators.

Mestenhauser, J. A. (2015). On the hologram of international education: With Raya Hegeman-Davis, Amy Lee, Nue Lor, & Rhiannon Williams. In R. D. Williams & A. Lee (Eds.), Internationalizing higher education: Critical collaborations across the curriculum (s. 3-16). Sense Publishers.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-980-7_1

Mestenhauser, J. A., & Ellingboe, B. J. (2005). Leadership knowledge and international education. International Educator, 14(6), 36.

Meyer, T., Sales Marques, J. L. de, & Telò, M. (Ed.). (2020). Cultures, nationalism and populism: New challenges to multilateralism. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429260421

Novotný, J., & Svobodová, J. (2021). Jak pracuje věda. 2. vyd. Burian a Tichák.

O'Neil, J. M., Good, G. E., & Holmes, S. (1995). Fifteen years of theory and research on men's gender role conflict: New paradigms for empirical research. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (s. 164-206). Basic Books.

O'Neill, B. C., Carter, T. R., Ebi, K., Harrison, P. A., Kemp-Benedict, E., Kok, K., … & Pichs-Madruga, R. (2020). Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework. Nature Climate Change, 10(12).

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00952-0

PMid:33262808

Palouš, R. (2008). Heretická škola: O filosofii výchovy ve světověku a Patočkově pedagogice čili filipika proti upadlé škole. Oikoymenh.

Palouš, R. (2009). Paradoxy výchovy. Karolinum.

Palouš, R. (2010). Filosofická reflexe několika pojmů školské pedagogiky. Karolinum.

Patočka, J. (1996). Péče o duši I. Oikoymenh.

Patočka, J. (2003). Úvod do fenomenologické filosofie. Oikoymenh.

Patočka, J. (2024). Může filosofie zaniknout? Oikoymenh.

Pembleton, D. J., & Fry, G. W. (2022). Reimagining the field of international education through the vision of a Renaissance internationalist: The Minnesota case. In A. M. D'Angelo, M. K. O'Brien & G. Marty (Eds.), Mestenhauser and the possibilities of international education (s. 44-57). Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003159810-7

Pickard, S., Bowman, B., & Arya, D. (2020). "We are radical in our kindness": The political socialisation, motivations, demands and protest actions of young environmental activists in Britain. Youth and Globalization, 2(2), 251-280.

https://doi.org/10.1163/25895745-02020007

Průcha, J. (2002). Moderní pedagogika. Portál.

Ricoeur, P., Petříček, M., & Dvořáková, V. (2000). Čas a vyprávění. I: Zápletka a historické vyprávění. Oikoymenh.

Rupert, R. D. (2010). Cognitive systems and the extended mind. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195379457.001.0001

Sakkopoulos, S. A., & Vitoratos, E. G. (1996). Empirical foundations of atomism in ancient Greek philosophy. Science & Education, 5(3), 293-303.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414318

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Interacion Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1).

Siemens, G. (2018). Connectivism. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology (kap. 19). (Online). Dostupné z https://lidtfoundations.pressbooks.com/chapter/connectivism.

Sokol, J. (2014). Etika, život, instituce: Pokus o praktickou filosofii. Vyšehrad.

Sokol, J. (2015). Moc, peníze a právo: Esej o společnosti a jejích institucích. Vyšehrad.

Sokol, J. (2016). Člověk jako osoba: Filosofická antropologie. 3. vyd. Vyšehrad.

Spracklen, K. (2020). Populism, nationalism and masculinity today: A review. In K. Spracklen, Metal music and the re-imagining of masculinity, place, race and nation (s. 29-42). Emerald Publishing Limited.

https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83867-443-420201004

Steh, B., Kalin, J., & Mazgon, J. (2014). The role and responsibility of teachers and students in university studies: A comparative analysis of the views expressed by pedagogy students. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja, 46, 50-68.

https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI1401050S

Steinerová J. (2020). Etika digitálnych informácií vo svetle sociálnych hodnôt informácií. Itlib, 24(2), 6-21.

https://doi.org/10.52036/1335793X.2021.1-2.24-30

Šíp, R. (2013). Problematické aspekty současné pedagogiky z pohledu pedagogické filozofie: Vztah praxe a teorie a potlačení somatické dimense pedagogických procesů. Masarykova univerzita.

Šíp, R. (2019). Proč školství a jeho aktéři selhávají. Masarykova univerzita.

https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-9378-2019

Taggart, G. (2002). Spiritual literacy and tacit knowledge. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 23(1), 7-17.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13617670220125638

Teilhard de Chardin, P. (1990). Vesmír a lidstvo. Vyšehrad.

Published

2025-01-31

Issue

Section

Theoretical paper