Vizuálie v geografickém vzdělávání: přehledová studie

Tomáš Janko; Petr Knecht; Silvie Rita Kučerová; Jan Daniel Bláha

doi:10.14712/18047106.1027

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2018): sciED Surveys

Visuals in Geography Education: A Review

Tomáš Janko, ¹ Petr Knecht, ¹ Silvie Rita Kučerová, ² Jan Daniel Bláha, ²

Masarykova univerzita, Pedagogická fakulta, Institut výzkumu školního vzdělávání, Poříčí 31, 60300
Univerzita J. E. Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Katedra geografie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1027

pdf (Czech)

How to Cite

Janko, T., Knecht, P., Kučerová, S. R., & Bláha, J. D. (2018). Visuals in Geography Education: A Review. Scientia in Educatione, 9(2), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1027

Download Citation

Abstract

The study seeks to explain how evidence-based knowledge about learning from visual material can be utilized by way of improving the visuals used in geography education. The aim of this narrative review is to find out: a) the theoretical foundations of learning from visuals, b) how to operationalize geographical visuals in a way that would facilitate research on school instruction and inform the production of textbooks and atlases, c) to identify (based on the state of the art) some domain specific recommendations contributing
to more understandable and pupil-friendly static visualization of geographical phenomena. The methodology is based on the review of literature related to the domains of cognitive psychology, educational science, and geography education. In the concluding part, it is suggested how the findings of our study may contribute to the improvement of visuals in geography education.

References

Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33(2–3), 131–152. Search in Google Scholar
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. Search in Google Scholar
Aumont, J. (2011). L’Image. Paris: Armand Colin. Search in Google Scholar
Ballstaedt, S.P. (1997). Wissensvermittlung: Die Gestaltung von Lernmaterial. Weinheim: Beltz. Search in Google Scholar
Benedek, A. & Nyíri, K. (2012). Theiconicturnineducation. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Search in Google Scholar
Bertin, J. (1967). Sémiologie graphique: Les diagrammes – les réseaux – les cartes.Paris: Mouton. Search in Google Scholar
Bláha, J.D. 2010. Various ways of assessment of cartographic works. In G. Gartner & F.Ortag(Eds.), Cartography in Central and Eastern Europe. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (211–229). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Search in Google Scholar
Bresciani, S. & Eppler, M.J. (2015). The pitfalls of visual representations. Sage Open, 5(4), 1–14. Search in Google Scholar
Češková, T. (2017). Výukové situace rozvíjející kompetenci k řešení problémů: teoretický model jako východisko pro jejich analýzu. Pedagogika, 66(5), 530–548. Search in Google Scholar
Chi, M.T., Feltovich, P.J. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Search in Google Scholar
Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. Search in Google Scholar
Claval, P. (1998). An introduction to regional geography. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar
Davies, P. (2000). The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3–4), 365–378. Search in Google Scholar
Davis, T.J. & Keller, C.P. (1997). Modelling uncertainty in natural resource analysis using fuzzy sets and Monte Carlo simulation: slope stability prediction. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11(5), 409–434. Search in Google Scholar
de Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. Search in Google Scholar
Deitrick, S. & Edsall, R. (2008). Making uncertainty usable: Approaches for visualizing uncertainty information. In M. Dodge, McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (277–292). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar
Dodge, M., McDerby, M. & Turner, M. (2008). The power of geographical visualuzations. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (1–10). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1976). Theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Gates, S. (2004): Visual literacy in science and its importance to pupils and teachers. In A. Peacock & A. Cleghorn (Eds.), Search in Google Scholar
Missing the meaning (223–237). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar
Gregory, D. (2009). Geography. In D. Gregory, et al., The dictionary of human geography (287–295). Malden: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar
Haggett, P. (1990). The geographer’s art. Camebridge: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar
Halverson, L.H. (1968). Geography via pictures. Do it this way. Illinois: National Council for Geographic Education. Search in Google Scholar
Hampl, M. (1998). Realita, společnost a geografická organizace: hledání integrálního řádu. Praha: Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar
Harrower, M. & Fabrikant, S. (2008). The role of map animation for geographic visualization. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (49–65). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar
Havelková, L. (2016). Vliv kartografické vyjadřovací metody na úroveň mapových dovedností žáků. Diplomová práce. Praha: PřF UK. Search in Google Scholar
Hübelová, D., Najvarová, V. & Chárová, D. (2008). Uplatnění didaktických prostředků a médií ve výuce zeměpisu. In P. Knecht & T. Janík (Eds.), Učebnice z pohledu pedagogického výzkumu (147–163). Brno: Paido. Search in Google Scholar
Janko, T. (2012). Nonverbální prvky v učebnicích zeměpisu jako nástroj didaktické transformace. Brno: MU. Search in Google Scholar
Janko, T. (2015). Srovnávací analýza typů nonverbálních prvků v současných českých a německých učebnicích školní geografie. Pedagogická orientace, 25(2), 225–248. Search in Google Scholar
Jewitt, C. (2008). The visual in learning and creativity: A review of the literature. London: Creative Partnership. Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, R.J. (1986). Philosophy and human geography: An introduction to contemporary approaches. London: Edward Arnold. Search in Google Scholar
Jones, C.E., Haklay, M., Griffiths, S. & Vaughan, L. (2009). A less is more approach to geovisualization – enhancing knowledge construction across multidisciplinary teams. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(8), 1077–1093. Search in Google Scholar
Koláčný, A. (1969). Cartographic information – a fundamental concept and term in modern cartography. The Cartographic Journal, 6(1), 47–49. Search in Google Scholar
Kraak, M.J. (2008). Visualization and time. New opportunities for the space-time cube. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (293–306). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar
Larkin, J.H. & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–99. Search in Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar
Leitner, H. & Miller, B. (2007). Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: A commentary on Marston, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 116–125. Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd, R., Hodgson, M.E. & Stokes, A. (2002). Visual categorization with aerial photographs. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(2), 241–266. Search in Google Scholar
Lowe, R.K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 225–244. Search in Google Scholar
MacEachren, A.M., Gahegan, M., Pike, W., Brewer, I., Cai, G., Lengerich, E. & Hardistry, F. (2004). Geovisualization for knowledge construction and decision support. Computer Graphics and Applications IEEE, 24(1), 13–17. Search in Google Scholar
Marada, M. & Hanus, M. (2014). Mapové dovednosti: vymezení a výzkum. Geografie, 119(4), 406–422. Search in Google Scholar
Mareš, J. (2013a). Pedagogická psychologie. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar
Mareš, J. (2013b). Přehledové studie: jejich typologie, funkce a způsob vytváření. Pedagogická orientace, 23(4), 427–454. Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, R.E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19. Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, R.E. (2011). Instruction based on visualisations. In R.E. Mayer & P.A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (427–445). New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, R.E. (2013). Fostering learning with visual displays. In G. Schraw, M.T. McCrudden & D. Robinson (Eds.), Search in Google Scholar
Learning through visual displays (47–73). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, R.E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), Multimedia learning (43–71). New York: Cambridge. Search in Google Scholar
McTigue, E.M. & Coleman, J.M. (2013). Theory, practice, and challenges for teaching visual literacy in science. In K.D. Finson & J.E. Pedersen (Eds.), Visual data and their use in science education (281–307). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Search in Google Scholar
Mrázková, K. (2013). Kartografické dovednosti ve výuce zeměpisu (Disertační práce). Brno: PdF MU. Search in Google Scholar
Osman, R. & Matoušek, R. (2014). Úvod obratem. In R. Matoušek & R. Osman (Eds.), Prostor(y) geografie (9–18). Praha: Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar
Paasi, A. (1986): The institutionalization of regions: a theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity. Fennia, 164(1), 105–146. Search in Google Scholar
Paasi, A. (2004). Place and region: Looking through the prism of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 28(4), 536–564. Search in Google Scholar
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and mental processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Search in Google Scholar
Paivio, A. (2014). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. New York: Psychology Press. Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Ch.S. (1997). Sémiotika. Praha: Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar
Pettersson, R. (1992). The use of visuals in oral representations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(2), 109–116. Search in Google Scholar
Priestnall, G. & Hampson, D. (2008). Landscape visualization: Science and art. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Search in Google Scholar
Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (241–258). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar
Radinsky, J., Leimberer, J.M. & Rodriguez, C. (2013). Learning to do geospatial data visualizations in science classrooms. I Search in Google Scholar
nK.D.Finson&J.E.Pedersen(Eds.), Visual data and their use in science education (239–260). Charlotte: IAP Publishing. Search in Google Scholar
Rose, G. (1994). Teaching visualized geographies: Towards a methodology for the interpretation of visual materials. Search in Google Scholar
Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), 281–294. Search in Google Scholar
Rose, G. (2007). Visual Methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar
Roth, W.M. & Bowen, G.M. (2001). Professionals read graphs: A semiotic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 159–194. Search in Google Scholar
Sadoski, M. & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar
Schnotz, W. (2002). Commentary – Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 101–120. Search in Google Scholar
Schnotz, W. (2014). Integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), Multimedia learning Search in Google Scholar
(72–103). New York: Cambridge Search in Google Scholar
Schnotz, W. & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2) 141–156. Search in Google Scholar
Schnotz, W., Ludewig, U., Ullrich, M., Horz, H., McElvany, N. & Baumert, J. (2014). Strategy shifts during learning from texts and pictures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 974–989. Search in Google Scholar
Sheppard, E. & McMaster, R.B. (Eds.). (2004). Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society and method. Oxford: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar
Siwek, T. (2011). Percepce geografického prostoru. Praha: ČGS. Search in Google Scholar
Skupin, A. & Esperbé, A. (2008). Towards high-resolution self-organizing maps of geographic features. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (49–65). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar
Spiro, R.J. & Jehng, J.C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for nonlinear and multi-dimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R.J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education and multi-media: Exploring ideas in high technology (163–205). Hillsdale: LEA. Search in Google Scholar
Svatoňová, H. (2017). Reading satellite images, aerial photos and maps: Development of cartographic and visual literacy. In P. Karvánková, D. Popjaková, M. Vančura &J.Mládek(Eds.), Current Topics in Czech and Central European Geography Search in Google Scholar
Education (187–208). Cham: Springer. Search in Google Scholar
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285. Search in Google Scholar
Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (19–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Swienty, O., Reichenbacher, T., Reppermund, S. & Zihl, J. (2008). The role of relevance and cognition in attention-guiding geovisualisation. The Cartographic Journal, 45(3), 227–238. Search in Google Scholar
Taussig, M. (2011). I swear I saw this: Drawings in fieldwork notebooks, namely my own. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar
Unwin, D.J. (2008). Encounters with geovisualization. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.). Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (xi–xvi). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar
Van Meter, P. (2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 129–140. Search in Google Scholar
Vít, L. & Bláha, J.D. (2012). Study of the user friendliness of temporal legends in animated maps.AUC Geographica, 47(2), 53–61. Search in Google Scholar
Wainer, H. (1992). Understanding graphs and tables. Educational Researcher, 21(1), 14–23. Search in Google Scholar
Wiegand, P. (2006). Learning and teaching with maps. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar
Wooldridge, S.W. & East, W.G. (1951). The spirit & purpose of geography. London: Hutchinson. Search in Google Scholar

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

[1] Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33(2–3), 131–152. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Aumont, J. (2011). L’Image. Paris: Armand Colin. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ballstaedt, S.P. (1997). Wissensvermittlung: Die Gestaltung von Lernmaterial. Weinheim: Beltz. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Benedek, A. & Nyíri, K. (2012). Theiconicturnineducation. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bertin, J. (1967). Sémiologie graphique: Les diagrammes – les réseaux – les cartes.Paris: Mouton. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Bláha, J.D. 2010. Various ways of assessment of cartographic works. In G. Gartner & F.Ortag(Eds.), Cartography in Central and Eastern Europe. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (211–229). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bresciani, S. & Eppler, M.J. (2015). The pitfalls of visual representations. Sage Open, 5(4), 1–14. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Češková, T. (2017). Výukové situace rozvíjející kompetenci k řešení problémů: teoretický model jako východisko pro jejich analýzu. Pedagogika, 66(5), 530–548. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Chi, M.T., Feltovich, P.J. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Claval, P. (1998). An introduction to regional geography. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Davies, P. (2000). The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3–4), 365–378. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Davis, T.J. & Keller, C.P. (1997). Modelling uncertainty in natural resource analysis using fuzzy sets and Monte Carlo simulation: slope stability prediction. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11(5), 409–434. Search in Google Scholar

[15] de Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Deitrick, S. & Edsall, R. (2008). Making uncertainty usable: Approaches for visualizing uncertainty information. In M. Dodge, McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (277–292). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Dodge, M., McDerby, M. & Turner, M. (2008). The power of geographical visualuzations. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (1–10). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Eco, U. (1976). Theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Gates, S. (2004): Visual literacy in science and its importance to pupils and teachers. In A. Peacock & A. Cleghorn (Eds.), Search in Google Scholar

[20] Missing the meaning (223–237). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Gregory, D. (2009). Geography. In D. Gregory, et al., The dictionary of human geography (287–295). Malden: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Haggett, P. (1990). The geographer’s art. Camebridge: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Halverson, L.H. (1968). Geography via pictures. Do it this way. Illinois: National Council for Geographic Education. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Hampl, M. (1998). Realita, společnost a geografická organizace: hledání integrálního řádu. Praha: Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Harrower, M. & Fabrikant, S. (2008). The role of map animation for geographic visualization. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (49–65). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Havelková, L. (2016). Vliv kartografické vyjadřovací metody na úroveň mapových dovedností žáků. Diplomová práce. Praha: PřF UK. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Hübelová, D., Najvarová, V. & Chárová, D. (2008). Uplatnění didaktických prostředků a médií ve výuce zeměpisu. In P. Knecht & T. Janík (Eds.), Učebnice z pohledu pedagogického výzkumu (147–163). Brno: Paido. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Janko, T. (2012). Nonverbální prvky v učebnicích zeměpisu jako nástroj didaktické transformace. Brno: MU. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Janko, T. (2015). Srovnávací analýza typů nonverbálních prvků v současných českých a německých učebnicích školní geografie. Pedagogická orientace, 25(2), 225–248. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Jewitt, C. (2008). The visual in learning and creativity: A review of the literature. London: Creative Partnership. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Johnston, R.J. (1986). Philosophy and human geography: An introduction to contemporary approaches. London: Edward Arnold. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Jones, C.E., Haklay, M., Griffiths, S. & Vaughan, L. (2009). A less is more approach to geovisualization – enhancing knowledge construction across multidisciplinary teams. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(8), 1077–1093. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Koláčný, A. (1969). Cartographic information – a fundamental concept and term in modern cartography. The Cartographic Journal, 6(1), 47–49. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Kraak, M.J. (2008). Visualization and time. New opportunities for the space-time cube. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (293–306). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Larkin, J.H. & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–99. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Leitner, H. & Miller, B. (2007). Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: A commentary on Marston, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 116–125. Search in Google Scholar

[39] Lloyd, R., Hodgson, M.E. & Stokes, A. (2002). Visual categorization with aerial photographs. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(2), 241–266. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Lowe, R.K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 225–244. Search in Google Scholar

[41] MacEachren, A.M., Gahegan, M., Pike, W., Brewer, I., Cai, G., Lengerich, E. & Hardistry, F. (2004). Geovisualization for knowledge construction and decision support. Computer Graphics and Applications IEEE, 24(1), 13–17. Search in Google Scholar

[42] Marada, M. & Hanus, M. (2014). Mapové dovednosti: vymezení a výzkum. Geografie, 119(4), 406–422. Search in Google Scholar

[43] Mareš, J. (2013a). Pedagogická psychologie. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Mareš, J. (2013b). Přehledové studie: jejich typologie, funkce a způsob vytváření. Pedagogická orientace, 23(4), 427–454. Search in Google Scholar

[45] Mayer, R.E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19. Search in Google Scholar

[46] Mayer, R.E. (2011). Instruction based on visualisations. In R.E. Mayer & P.A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (427–445). New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[47] Mayer, R.E. (2013). Fostering learning with visual displays. In G. Schraw, M.T. McCrudden & D. Robinson (Eds.), Search in Google Scholar

[48] Learning through visual displays (47–73). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

[49] Mayer, R.E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), Multimedia learning (43–71). New York: Cambridge. Search in Google Scholar

[50] McTigue, E.M. & Coleman, J.M. (2013). Theory, practice, and challenges for teaching visual literacy in science. In K.D. Finson & J.E. Pedersen (Eds.), Visual data and their use in science education (281–307). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

[51] Mrázková, K. (2013). Kartografické dovednosti ve výuce zeměpisu (Disertační práce). Brno: PdF MU. Search in Google Scholar

[52] Osman, R. & Matoušek, R. (2014). Úvod obratem. In R. Matoušek & R. Osman (Eds.), Prostor(y) geografie (9–18). Praha: Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar

[53] Paasi, A. (1986): The institutionalization of regions: a theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity. Fennia, 164(1), 105–146. Search in Google Scholar

[54] Paasi, A. (2004). Place and region: Looking through the prism of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 28(4), 536–564. Search in Google Scholar

[55] Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and mental processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Search in Google Scholar

[56] Paivio, A. (2014). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. New York: Psychology Press. Search in Google Scholar

[57] Peirce, Ch.S. (1997). Sémiotika. Praha: Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar

[58] Pettersson, R. (1992). The use of visuals in oral representations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(2), 109–116. Search in Google Scholar

[59] Priestnall, G. & Hampson, D. (2008). Landscape visualization: Science and art. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Search in Google Scholar

[60] Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (241–258). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

[61] Radinsky, J., Leimberer, J.M. & Rodriguez, C. (2013). Learning to do geospatial data visualizations in science classrooms. I Search in Google Scholar

[62] nK.D.Finson&J.E.Pedersen(Eds.), Visual data and their use in science education (239–260). Charlotte: IAP Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

[63] Rose, G. (1994). Teaching visualized geographies: Towards a methodology for the interpretation of visual materials. Search in Google Scholar

[64] Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), 281–294. Search in Google Scholar

[65] Rose, G. (2007). Visual Methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar

[66] Roth, W.M. & Bowen, G.M. (2001). Professionals read graphs: A semiotic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 159–194. Search in Google Scholar

[67] Sadoski, M. & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar

[68] Schnotz, W. (2002). Commentary – Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 101–120. Search in Google Scholar

[69] Schnotz, W. (2014). Integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), Multimedia learning Search in Google Scholar

[70] (72–103). New York: Cambridge Search in Google Scholar

[71] Schnotz, W. & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2) 141–156. Search in Google Scholar

[72] Schnotz, W., Ludewig, U., Ullrich, M., Horz, H., McElvany, N. & Baumert, J. (2014). Strategy shifts during learning from texts and pictures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 974–989. Search in Google Scholar

[73] Sheppard, E. & McMaster, R.B. (Eds.). (2004). Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society and method. Oxford: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

[74] Siwek, T. (2011). Percepce geografického prostoru. Praha: ČGS. Search in Google Scholar

[75] Skupin, A. & Esperbé, A. (2008). Towards high-resolution self-organizing maps of geographic features. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (49–65). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

[76] Spiro, R.J. & Jehng, J.C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for nonlinear and multi-dimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R.J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education and multi-media: Exploring ideas in high technology (163–205). Hillsdale: LEA. Search in Google Scholar

[77] Svatoňová, H. (2017). Reading satellite images, aerial photos and maps: Development of cartographic and visual literacy. In P. Karvánková, D. Popjaková, M. Vančura &J.Mládek(Eds.), Current Topics in Czech and Central European Geography Search in Google Scholar

[78] Education (187–208). Cham: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

[79] Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285. Search in Google Scholar

[80] Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (19–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[81] Swienty, O., Reichenbacher, T., Reppermund, S. & Zihl, J. (2008). The role of relevance and cognition in attention-guiding geovisualisation. The Cartographic Journal, 45(3), 227–238. Search in Google Scholar

[82] Taussig, M. (2011). I swear I saw this: Drawings in fieldwork notebooks, namely my own. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

[83] Unwin, D.J. (2008). Encounters with geovisualization. In M. Dodge, M. McDerby & M. Turner (Eds.). Geographic visualization. Concepts, tools and applications (xi–xvi). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

[84] Van Meter, P. (2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 129–140. Search in Google Scholar

[85] Vít, L. & Bláha, J.D. (2012). Study of the user friendliness of temporal legends in animated maps.AUC Geographica, 47(2), 53–61. Search in Google Scholar

[86] Wainer, H. (1992). Understanding graphs and tables. Educational Researcher, 21(1), 14–23. Search in Google Scholar

[87] Wiegand, P. (2006). Learning and teaching with maps. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[88] Wooldridge, S.W. & East, W.G. (1951). The spirit & purpose of geography. London: Hutchinson. Search in Google Scholar

Scientia in educatione

Visuals in Geography Education: A Review

How to Cite

Abstract

References

Downloads

License

Most read articles by the same author(s)