Pohled žáků vybraných základních škol a gymnázií na hodnocení při hodinách přírodopisu a biologie s akcentem na formativní hodnocení

Lukáš Rokos; Jana Lišková; Lucie Váchová; Magdalena Cihlářová; Magdalena Chadová; Jana Strapková

doi:10.14712/18047106.1234

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2019): SciED Research Reports

Views of pupils from selected elementary and secondary grammar schools of assessment in biology lessons with the focus on formative assessment

Lukáš Rokos, ¹ Jana Lišková, Lucie Váchová, Magdalena Cihlářová, Magdalena Chadová, Jana Strapková,

University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1234

Rokos Scied 10(1) 2019 (Czech)

How to Cite

Rokos, L., Lišková, J., Váchová, L., Cihlářová, M., Chadová, M., & Strapková, J. (2019). Views of pupils from selected elementary and secondary grammar schools of assessment in biology lessons with the focus on formative assessment. Scientia in Educatione, 10(1), 90-112. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1234

Download Citation

Abstract

Formative assessment has become a frequently discussed evaluation approach which can help enhance the students‘ performance in science subjects. The ASSIST-ME was a European project focused on helping the effective implementation of formative and summative assessment in inquiry-based learning in science and mathematics in elementary and secondary schools in different European educational environments. It also sought to verify the readiness of teachers and teacher trainees to use formative assessment in teaching.
This paper presents the results of the probe investigating the experience of students from selected elementary and grammar schools in the region of South Bohemia with various assessment methods in biology. The emphasis was put on the students‘ knowledge and personal experience with formative assessment. Data from 1 848 respondents were obtained by a questionnaire survey. The survey has proved that the summative assessment is prevailing assessing approach at the selected schools but the students find this approach satisfactory and prefer it to other assessing approaches. Students also stated that they had generally been examined in written form with focus on their content knowledge. Approximately half of the respondents claimed they had had personal experience with the formative assessment.

References

Anderson, R.D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015171124982 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Bernholt, S., Rönnebeck, S., Ropohl, M., Köller, O. & Parchmann, I. (2013). Report on current state of the art in formative and summative assessment in IBE in STM – Part I. Dostupné z http://assistme.ku.dk/resources/report series/no1/131015 del 2 4 IPN PE-I-web.pdf Search in Google Scholar
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–71. DOI: 10.1080/0969595980050102 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21. DOI: 10.1177/003172170408600105 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Boulet, M.-M., Simard, G. & De Melo, D. (1990). Formative evaluation effects on learning music. Journal of Educational Research, 84(2), 119–125. DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1990.10886002 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Brown, G. (2013). Student conceptions of assessment across cultural and contextual differences: University student perspectives of assessment from Brazil, China, Hong Kong, and New Zealand. In G. Liem & A. Bernardo (Eds.), Advancing cross-cultural perspectives on educational psychology: A Festschrift for Dennis McInerney (143–167). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Search in Google Scholar
Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effect of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Dostál, J. (2015). Badatelsky orientovaná výuka: Pojetí, podstata, význam a přínosy. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. DOI: 10.5507/pdf.15.24443935 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Dunn, K. E. & Mulvenon, S.W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical Assessment & Research and Evaluation, 14(7), 1–11. Search in Google Scholar
Duschl, A.R., Schweingruber, A. H. & Shouse, W. A. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/11625 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Furtak, E.M. (2009). Formative assessment for secondary science Teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Search in Google Scholar
Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment to support student learning. Leeds: Leeds Metropolitan University. Search in Google Scholar
Harlen, W. (2007). Assessment of learning. London: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar
Hendl, J. (2016). Kvalitativní výzkum: základní metody a aplikace. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar
Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140–145. DOI: 10.1177/003172170708900210 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Chappuis, S. & Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Classroom assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 60(1), 40–43. Search in Google Scholar
Chin, Ch. & Teou, L. (2010). Formative assessment: Using koncept cartoon, pupils‘ drawings, and group discussions to tackle children‘ s ideas about biological inheritance. Journal of Biological Education, 44(3), 108–115. DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2010.9656206 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Chráska, M. & Kočvarová, I. (2015). Kvantitativní metody sběru dat v pedagogických výzkumech. Zlín: Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně, Fakulta humanitních studií. Search in Google Scholar
Jeřábek, J., Krčková, S. & Hučínová, L. (2007). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro gymnázia. Praha: Výzkumný ústav pedagogický v Praze. Search in Google Scholar
Jeřábek, J. & Tupý, J. (2017). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání. Praha: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy České republiky. Search in Google Scholar
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, B., Marx, R. & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiry into inquiry: Science learning and teaching (283–315). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press. Search in Google Scholar
Laufková, V. (2017). Formativní hodnocení v praxi české základní školy. Pedagogika, 67(2), 126–146. Search in Google Scholar
Laufková, V. & Novotná, K. (2014). Školní hodnocení z pohledu žáků. Orbis scholae, 8(1), 111–127. DOI: 10.14712/23362189.2017.424 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Le Hebel, F., Constantinou, C.P., Hospesova, A., Grob, R., Holmeier, M., Montpied, P., Moulin, M., Petr, J., Rokos, L., Stuchlikova, I., Tiberghien, A., Tsivitanidou, O. & Zlabkova, I. (2018). Students’ perspectives on peer assessment. In J. Dolin and R. Evans (Eds.), Transforming assessment: Through an interplay between practice, research and policy (141–174). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Leitch, R. (2008). Consulting pupils on the assessment of their learning. Teaching and Learning, 36, 1–4. DOI: 10.1080/09650790701514887 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Looney, J. (2011). Developing high-quality teachers: teacher evaluation for improvement. European Journal of Education: Research, Development and Policy, 46(4), 440–455. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01492.x Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Maršák, J. & Janoušková, S. (2006). Trendy v přírodovědném vzdělávání. Metodický portál RVP 2006. [cit. 2018–06–16] Dostupné z http://clanky.rvp.cz/clanek/a/115/1055/TRENDY-V-PRIRODOVEDNEM-VZDELAVANI.html/ Search in Google Scholar
McCann, L. & Saunders, G. (2012). Exploring student perceptions of assessment feedback. Southampton: University of Southampton, The Higher Education Academy. Dostupné z http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/1832/1/SWAP Assessment Feedback.pdf Search in Google Scholar
McInerney, D., Brown, G.T. L. & Liem, G.A.D. (Eds.) (2009). Student perspectives on assessment. What students can tell us about assessment for learning. Charlotte, NC: IAP. Search in Google Scholar
Melmer, R., Burmaster, E. & James, T.K. (2008). Attributes of effective formative assessment. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers Publishing. Search in Google Scholar
Nelešovská, A. (2005). Pedagogická komunikace v teorii a praxi. Praha: Grada. Search in Google Scholar
Newton, P. E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 149–170. DOI: 10.1080/09695940701478321 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Novotná, K. & Krabsová, V. (2013). Formativní hodnocení: případová studie. Pedagogika, 63(3), 355–371. Search in Google Scholar
OECD. (2013). Reviews of evaluation and assessment in education – synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD Publishing. Search in Google Scholar
Osborne, J. F. & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. [cit. 2018–06–20] Dostupné z http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/science-educationeurope Search in Google Scholar
Papáček, M., Čížková, V., Kubiatko, M., Petr, J. & Závodská, R. (2015). Didaktika biologie: didaktika v rekonstrukci. In I. Stuchlíková & T. Janík (Eds.), Oborové didaktiky: vývoj – stav – perspektivy (225–257). Brno: Masarykova univerzita. DOI: 10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-7884-2015 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Papáček, M. (2010). Limity a šance zavádění badatelsky orientovaného vyučování přírodopisu a biologie v České republice. In M. Papáček (Ed.), Didaktika biologie v České republice 2010 a badatelsky orientované vyučování (145–162). DiBi 2010. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta. Search in Google Scholar
Petr, J., Ditrich, T., Závodská, R. & Papáček, M. (2015). Inquiry based biology education in the Czech Republic: A reflection of five years dissemination. In K. Maaß, B. Barzel, G. Törner, D. Wernish, D. Schäfer & K. Reiz-Konzebovski (Eds.), Education the educators: International approaches to scaling-up professional development in mathematic and science education (118–124). Münster: WTM – Verlag für wissenschaftliche Texte und Medien. Search in Google Scholar
Petty, G. (2013). Moderní vyučování. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar
Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Search in Google Scholar
Průcha, J., Walterová, E. & Mareš, J. (2003). Pedagogický slovník. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar
Radvanová, S. (2017). Efektivita vybraných vzdělávacích postupů ve výuce biologie. Dizertační práce. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Pedagogická fakulta. Search in Google Scholar
Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Wahlberg-Henrikson, H. & Hermmo, U. (2007). Science education NOW: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Comission. Search in Google Scholar
Ronan, A. (2014). Every teacher‘ s guide to assessment [cit. 2018–06–16]. Dostupné z http://www.edudemic.com/summative-and-formative-assessments/ Search in Google Scholar
Rokos, L. (2017). Hodnocení badatelsky orientované výuky biologie [Dizertační práce]. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta. Search in Google Scholar
Rokos, L. & Vomáčková, V. (2017). Hodnocení efektivity badatelsky orientovaného vyučování v laboratorních pracích při výuce fyziologie člověka na základní škole a nižším stupni gymnázia. Scientia in Educatione, 8(1), 1–14. Search in Google Scholar
Rokos, L. & Závodská, R. (2015). Formative assessment and other assessment methods in biology education and pre-service biology teacher training in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 23(2), 17–27. Search in Google Scholar
Rokos, L., Závodská, R., Petr, J. & Papáček, M. (2016). Formative assessment methods in biology education: Pedagogical study at primary school in the Czech Republic. Bulletin of the South Ural State University, Educational Sciences, 8(4), 94–99. DOI: 10.14529/ped160413 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Rokos, L. & Žlábková, I. (in prep.). Implementace formativního hodnocení v badatelsky orientovaném vyučování z pohledu učitelů. Search in Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M.A. & Furtak, E.M. (2006). Exploring teachers‘ informal formative assessment practices and students‘ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20163 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Ryplová, R. & Reháková, J. (2011). Přínos badatelsky orientovaného vyučování (BOV) pro environmentální výchovu: Případová studie implementace BOV do výuky na ZŠ. Envigogika, 6(3), 1–9. DOI: 10.14712/18023061.65 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Řehák, B. (1967). Vyučování biologii (na základní devítileté škole a střední všeobecně vzdělávací škole). Praha: SPN. Search in Google Scholar
Santiago, P., et al. (2012). Reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Czech Republic 2012. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/9789264116788-en Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Skalková, J. (2007). Obecná didaktika. 2. rozšířené a aktualizované vydání. Praha: Grada. Search in Google Scholar
Skutil, M. (2011). Základy pedagogicko-psychologického výzkumu pro studenty učitelství. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar
Slavík, J. (1999). Hodnocení v současné škole. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar
Starý, K. & Laufková, V., et al. (2016). Formativní hodnocení ve výuce. Praha: Portál Search in Google Scholar
Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758–765. Search in Google Scholar
Straková, J. & Slavík, J. (2013). (Formativní) hodnocení – aktuální téma. Pedagogika, 53(3), 277–284. Search in Google Scholar
Stuchlíková, I. (2010). O badatelsky orientovaném vyučování. In M. Papáček (Ed.), Didaktika biologie v České republice 2010 a badatelsky orientované vyučování (129–135). DiBi 2010. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta. Search in Google Scholar
Škoda, J. & Doulík, P. (2011). Psychodidaktika. Metody efektivního a smysluplného učení a vyučování. Praha: Grada. Search in Google Scholar
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 20–27. DOI: 10.1080/00405840802577569 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Topping, K. J. (2013). Peers as a source of formative and summative assessment. In Handbook of research on classroom assessment. Los Angeles: Sage Publishing. DOI: 10.4135/9781452218649.n22 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Vácha, Z. & Ditrich, T. (2016). Efektivita badatelsky orientovaného vyučování na primárním stupni základních škol v přírodovědném vzdělávání v České republice s využitím prostředí školních zahrad. Scientia in educatione, 7(1), 65–79. Search in Google Scholar
Vališová, A. & Kasíková, H. (2011). Pedagogika pro učitele. Praha: Grada Publishing. Search in Google Scholar
White, B.Y. & Frederiksen, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118. Search in Google Scholar
Watts, A. (2013). The assessment of practical science: a literature review. Cambridge: Cambridge Assessment. [cit. 2018–06–16] Dostupné z http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/images/135793-the-assessment-of-practical-science-a-literature-review.pdf Search in Google Scholar
Willey, K. & Gardner, A. (2009). Changing student’s perceptions of self and peer assessment. In Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium. Palm Cove. [cit. 2018–06–20] Dostupné z http://rees2009.pbworks.com/f/rees2009 submission 75.pdf Search in Google Scholar
Žlábková, I. & Rokos, L. (2013). Pohledy na formativní a sumativní hodnocení žáka v českých publikacích. Pedagogika, 63(3), 328–354. Search in Google Scholar

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

[1] Anderson, R.D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015171124982 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bernholt, S., Rönnebeck, S., Ropohl, M., Köller, O. & Parchmann, I. (2013). Report on current state of the art in formative and summative assessment in IBE in STM – Part I. Dostupné z http://assistme.ku.dk/resources/report series/no1/131015 del 2 4 IPN PE-I-web.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[3] Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–71. DOI: 10.1080/0969595980050102 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[4] Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[5] Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21. DOI: 10.1177/003172170408600105 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[6] Boulet, M.-M., Simard, G. & De Melo, D. (1990). Formative evaluation effects on learning music. Journal of Educational Research, 84(2), 119–125. DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1990.10886002 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[7] Brown, G. (2013). Student conceptions of assessment across cultural and contextual differences: University student perspectives of assessment from Brazil, China, Hong Kong, and New Zealand. In G. Liem & A. Bernardo (Eds.), Advancing cross-cultural perspectives on educational psychology: A Festschrift for Dennis McInerney (143–167). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effect of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[9] Dostál, J. (2015). Badatelsky orientovaná výuka: Pojetí, podstata, význam a přínosy. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. DOI: 10.5507/pdf.15.24443935 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[10] Dunn, K. E. & Mulvenon, S.W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical Assessment & Research and Evaluation, 14(7), 1–11. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Duschl, A.R., Schweingruber, A. H. & Shouse, W. A. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/11625 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[12] Furtak, E.M. (2009). Formative assessment for secondary science Teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment to support student learning. Leeds: Leeds Metropolitan University. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Harlen, W. (2007). Assessment of learning. London: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hendl, J. (2016). Kvalitativní výzkum: základní metody a aplikace. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140–145. DOI: 10.1177/003172170708900210 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[17] Chappuis, S. & Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Classroom assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 60(1), 40–43. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Chin, Ch. & Teou, L. (2010). Formative assessment: Using koncept cartoon, pupils‘ drawings, and group discussions to tackle children‘ s ideas about biological inheritance. Journal of Biological Education, 44(3), 108–115. DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2010.9656206 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[19] Chráska, M. & Kočvarová, I. (2015). Kvantitativní metody sběru dat v pedagogických výzkumech. Zlín: Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně, Fakulta humanitních studií. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Jeřábek, J., Krčková, S. & Hučínová, L. (2007). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro gymnázia. Praha: Výzkumný ústav pedagogický v Praze. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Jeřábek, J. & Tupý, J. (2017). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání. Praha: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy České republiky. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, B., Marx, R. & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiry into inquiry: Science learning and teaching (283–315). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Laufková, V. (2017). Formativní hodnocení v praxi české základní školy. Pedagogika, 67(2), 126–146. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Laufková, V. & Novotná, K. (2014). Školní hodnocení z pohledu žáků. Orbis scholae, 8(1), 111–127. DOI: 10.14712/23362189.2017.424 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[25] Le Hebel, F., Constantinou, C.P., Hospesova, A., Grob, R., Holmeier, M., Montpied, P., Moulin, M., Petr, J., Rokos, L., Stuchlikova, I., Tiberghien, A., Tsivitanidou, O. & Zlabkova, I. (2018). Students’ perspectives on peer assessment. In J. Dolin and R. Evans (Eds.), Transforming assessment: Through an interplay between practice, research and policy (141–174). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[26] Leitch, R. (2008). Consulting pupils on the assessment of their learning. Teaching and Learning, 36, 1–4. DOI: 10.1080/09650790701514887 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[27] Looney, J. (2011). Developing high-quality teachers: teacher evaluation for improvement. European Journal of Education: Research, Development and Policy, 46(4), 440–455. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01492.x Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[28] Maršák, J. & Janoušková, S. (2006). Trendy v přírodovědném vzdělávání. Metodický portál RVP 2006. [cit. 2018–06–16] Dostupné z http://clanky.rvp.cz/clanek/a/115/1055/TRENDY-V-PRIRODOVEDNEM-VZDELAVANI.html/ Search in Google Scholar

[29] McCann, L. & Saunders, G. (2012). Exploring student perceptions of assessment feedback. Southampton: University of Southampton, The Higher Education Academy. Dostupné z http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/1832/1/SWAP Assessment Feedback.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[30] McInerney, D., Brown, G.T. L. & Liem, G.A.D. (Eds.) (2009). Student perspectives on assessment. What students can tell us about assessment for learning. Charlotte, NC: IAP. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Melmer, R., Burmaster, E. & James, T.K. (2008). Attributes of effective formative assessment. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Nelešovská, A. (2005). Pedagogická komunikace v teorii a praxi. Praha: Grada. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Newton, P. E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 149–170. DOI: 10.1080/09695940701478321 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[34] Novotná, K. & Krabsová, V. (2013). Formativní hodnocení: případová studie. Pedagogika, 63(3), 355–371. Search in Google Scholar

[35] OECD. (2013). Reviews of evaluation and assessment in education – synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Osborne, J. F. & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. [cit. 2018–06–20] Dostupné z http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/science-educationeurope Search in Google Scholar

[37] Papáček, M., Čížková, V., Kubiatko, M., Petr, J. & Závodská, R. (2015). Didaktika biologie: didaktika v rekonstrukci. In I. Stuchlíková & T. Janík (Eds.), Oborové didaktiky: vývoj – stav – perspektivy (225–257). Brno: Masarykova univerzita. DOI: 10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-7884-2015 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[38] Papáček, M. (2010). Limity a šance zavádění badatelsky orientovaného vyučování přírodopisu a biologie v České republice. In M. Papáček (Ed.), Didaktika biologie v České republice 2010 a badatelsky orientované vyučování (145–162). DiBi 2010. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta. Search in Google Scholar

[39] Petr, J., Ditrich, T., Závodská, R. & Papáček, M. (2015). Inquiry based biology education in the Czech Republic: A reflection of five years dissemination. In K. Maaß, B. Barzel, G. Törner, D. Wernish, D. Schäfer & K. Reiz-Konzebovski (Eds.), Education the educators: International approaches to scaling-up professional development in mathematic and science education (118–124). Münster: WTM – Verlag für wissenschaftliche Texte und Medien. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Petty, G. (2013). Moderní vyučování. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar

[41] Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Search in Google Scholar

[42] Průcha, J., Walterová, E. & Mareš, J. (2003). Pedagogický slovník. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar

[43] Radvanová, S. (2017). Efektivita vybraných vzdělávacích postupů ve výuce biologie. Dizertační práce. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Pedagogická fakulta. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Wahlberg-Henrikson, H. & Hermmo, U. (2007). Science education NOW: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Comission. Search in Google Scholar

[45] Ronan, A. (2014). Every teacher‘ s guide to assessment [cit. 2018–06–16]. Dostupné z http://www.edudemic.com/summative-and-formative-assessments/ Search in Google Scholar

[46] Rokos, L. (2017). Hodnocení badatelsky orientované výuky biologie [Dizertační práce]. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta. Search in Google Scholar

[47] Rokos, L. & Vomáčková, V. (2017). Hodnocení efektivity badatelsky orientovaného vyučování v laboratorních pracích při výuce fyziologie člověka na základní škole a nižším stupni gymnázia. Scientia in Educatione, 8(1), 1–14. Search in Google Scholar

[48] Rokos, L. & Závodská, R. (2015). Formative assessment and other assessment methods in biology education and pre-service biology teacher training in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 23(2), 17–27. Search in Google Scholar

[49] Rokos, L., Závodská, R., Petr, J. & Papáček, M. (2016). Formative assessment methods in biology education: Pedagogical study at primary school in the Czech Republic. Bulletin of the South Ural State University, Educational Sciences, 8(4), 94–99. DOI: 10.14529/ped160413 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[50] Rokos, L. & Žlábková, I. (in prep.). Implementace formativního hodnocení v badatelsky orientovaném vyučování z pohledu učitelů. Search in Google Scholar

[51] Ruiz-Primo, M.A. & Furtak, E.M. (2006). Exploring teachers‘ informal formative assessment practices and students‘ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20163 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[52] Ryplová, R. & Reháková, J. (2011). Přínos badatelsky orientovaného vyučování (BOV) pro environmentální výchovu: Případová studie implementace BOV do výuky na ZŠ. Envigogika, 6(3), 1–9. DOI: 10.14712/18023061.65 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[53] Řehák, B. (1967). Vyučování biologii (na základní devítileté škole a střední všeobecně vzdělávací škole). Praha: SPN. Search in Google Scholar

[54] Santiago, P., et al. (2012). Reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Czech Republic 2012. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/9789264116788-en Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[55] Skalková, J. (2007). Obecná didaktika. 2. rozšířené a aktualizované vydání. Praha: Grada. Search in Google Scholar

[56] Skutil, M. (2011). Základy pedagogicko-psychologického výzkumu pro studenty učitelství. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar

[57] Slavík, J. (1999). Hodnocení v současné škole. Praha: Portál. Search in Google Scholar

[58] Starý, K. & Laufková, V., et al. (2016). Formativní hodnocení ve výuce. Praha: Portál Search in Google Scholar

[59] Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758–765. Search in Google Scholar

[60] Straková, J. & Slavík, J. (2013). (Formativní) hodnocení – aktuální téma. Pedagogika, 53(3), 277–284. Search in Google Scholar

[61] Stuchlíková, I. (2010). O badatelsky orientovaném vyučování. In M. Papáček (Ed.), Didaktika biologie v České republice 2010 a badatelsky orientované vyučování (129–135). DiBi 2010. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta. Search in Google Scholar

[62] Škoda, J. & Doulík, P. (2011). Psychodidaktika. Metody efektivního a smysluplného učení a vyučování. Praha: Grada. Search in Google Scholar

[63] Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 20–27. DOI: 10.1080/00405840802577569 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[64] Topping, K. J. (2013). Peers as a source of formative and summative assessment. In Handbook of research on classroom assessment. Los Angeles: Sage Publishing. DOI: 10.4135/9781452218649.n22 Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

[65] Vácha, Z. & Ditrich, T. (2016). Efektivita badatelsky orientovaného vyučování na primárním stupni základních škol v přírodovědném vzdělávání v České republice s využitím prostředí školních zahrad. Scientia in educatione, 7(1), 65–79. Search in Google Scholar

[66] Vališová, A. & Kasíková, H. (2011). Pedagogika pro učitele. Praha: Grada Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

[67] White, B.Y. & Frederiksen, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118. Search in Google Scholar

[68] Watts, A. (2013). The assessment of practical science: a literature review. Cambridge: Cambridge Assessment. [cit. 2018–06–16] Dostupné z http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/images/135793-the-assessment-of-practical-science-a-literature-review.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[69] Willey, K. & Gardner, A. (2009). Changing student’s perceptions of self and peer assessment. In Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium. Palm Cove. [cit. 2018–06–20] Dostupné z http://rees2009.pbworks.com/f/rees2009 submission 75.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[70] Žlábková, I. & Rokos, L. (2013). Pohledy na formativní a sumativní hodnocení žáka v českých publikacích. Pedagogika, 63(3), 328–354. Search in Google Scholar

Scientia in educatione

Views of pupils from selected elementary and secondary grammar schools of assessment in biology lessons with the focus on formative assessment

How to Cite

Abstract

References

Author Biography

Downloads

License

Most read articles by the same author(s)